What the monthly report contains
Each month you get one clear, independent record of how the system performed — not a raw dashboard, but a reconciled summary:
- Expected vs actual generation for the whole system and each string (weather-normalised).
- Performance and availability, aligned to IEC 61724-1.
- Any shortfall attributed to a cause — soiling, faults, downtime, degradation.
- The gap translated into recoverable revenue at your own tariff.
- A short, prioritised action list — what to fix first.
Why monthly, and why independent
Annual reviews find problems a year too late. Monthly reporting catches a developing issue while it’s still small, and builds a record you can trust — because it comes from an independent party that didn’t sell you the system. For an owner reporting to a board or a lender, or a CFO tracking the payback, that independent monthly record is the difference between a claim and evidence.
The reporting layer on top of monitoring
Reporting is only as good as the data underneath it. Ours sits on continuous, string-level inspection (Solar Performance Cloud): AI grades every string every day, solar engineers verify what matters, and the month’s findings are summarised into one clear report. So the monthly number is not a dashboard screenshot — it’s a reconciled, defensible record.
